Essay on how the three field system had to change essays

Essay on how the three field system had to change essays There were some advantages to the three field system such as: 2. There was co-operative faming - everyone worked together, 3. Commoners rights meant ability of all to graze their animals, 4. People could work for others who had more land to harvest. These were good things but people wanted change because: 1. Much time was wasted travelling between strips, 2. The land was not distributed fairly, 3. There were tensions between land owners or proper use of land, 4. Strips of grass between farm strips wasted much ground, 5. There was no room for Innervations. Everybody thought that there was a big need for change and they came up with some ideas: 1. The land could not continue to be fragmented, 3. The population was growing so there was more demand for food, 4. Towns and cities needed food that this system did not provide. these however never put into the rules of the three field system and the normal way carried on as usual. The people with less land and little money problems increased more when the commissioners made a parchment that was forty pages long and three feet by two feet in size explaining the new rules of the three field system. They said that the squire got well over 1000 acres, the parson got 400 acres, three wealthy villagers got 200 acres and the poor farmers got half an acre each. Also there was a rule where everyone built enclosures around their land. (There land was now all together, not in different strips) Because these enclosures had to built, the villagers had to pay towards it. They had to pay a sum of 30 each, a huge amount of money in their time. No poor villagers could afford this and were beside themselves with worry. ...